Residence, Contact and disputes over Children
The Family Procedure Rules (FPR) are the rules which the court must follow when deciding a family case. However, there is no need for a litigant in person to get too bogged down with the procedural rules. Judges have considerable discretion over how a case is conducted and will always explain carefully to a litigant in person what needs to be done.
The FPRs have the overriding objective of requiring the court to deal with a case justly, and having regard to the welfare issues involved. This must be achieved by dealing with the case expeditiously and fairly, and in a way proportionate to the nature, importance and complexity of the issues. It is a requirement that the court must ensure that the parties are on an equal footing, and the court must save expense and allot to the case an appropriate share of the court’s resources, whilst taking into account the need to allot resources to other cases. Judges must be proactive in managing cases in order to make sure that these overriding objective are achieved, and everyone involved in the case must help the court with this.
The Welfare Checklist
The court must comply with and have regard to the checklist in the Children Act 1989, when considering making a child arrangements order. This is commonly known as the welfare checklist and requires the court to take into consideration specifically:
- ‘…the ascertainable wishes and feelings of the child, which must be considered in the light of the child’s age and understanding.’
A child’s stated wishes and the importance of what the child wants will depend upon his or her age and understanding. If the child is 16 or over, it is extremely unlikely that a court would make an order contrary to the child’s wishes. Enforcement would in any event be extremely difficult.
Under 16 years, the court will take the child’s views into account, but not necessarily be bound by them. In the case of young children, although their view will be noted, they are likely to be treated with caution. With 5, 6 and 7 year olds, their wishes as to spending time with an absent parent will carry little weight. If there is a suspicion that a child has been coached by a parent, then the stated wishes of that child will be completely ignored. The court will condemn a parent who alienates a child against their other parent, and is likely to consider making an order that the child should live with the non-alienating parent, if he or she has shown that they will cooperate over the child arrangements.
- the child’s physical, emotional and educational needs
At one time, the courts would give weight to the belief that young children should be brought up by their mother. This was based upon the natural bond between young children and their mother, but any presumption has now been rejected by the court. This will still be a consideration, but is not as decisive as at one time. The law can be taken as being that it is usual for very young children to be with their mothers, but where there is a dispute, this will be a consideration but not a presumption.
- the likely effect on the child of any change in his or her circumstances
Where a child has had regular contact with a non-resident parent and there are now attempts to prevent this, a court will not hesitate in making an order that the child should have contact with that parent. Changes to the amount of time spent are however unlikely to be made initially. The court will wish to establish the amount of contact in line with what has been established, and then increase it gradually if appropriate.
If a child is settled living with one parent without problems, a parent wishing to change this arrangement will have an uphill struggle. When a status quo has been established and an arrangement shown to work, a court will not readily make changes unless short-term disruption is outweighed by other factors.
When considering a change in the circumstances, much may depend upon the nature of the child. Some children are able to deal with change better than others. Unnecessary changes to schooling will rarely find favour with the courts.
- the child’s age, sex, and background and any characteristics of the child which the court considers relevant
- Any harm which the child has suffered or is at risk of suffering
Protecting a child from any risk of harm will always be at the forefront of the court’s considerations.
- How capable each of the child’s parents is and any other person, in relation to whom the court considers the question to be relevant, of meeting the child’s needs
This brings into play a parent’s conduct, which is often an issue in child arrangements orders applications. In Children Act cases, the behaviour of a parent is only relevant in the way that it affects the child’s welfare. The behaviour of parents to each other may well be considered quite irrelevant.
Misconduct between parents may however be relevant in throwing light on the probable behaviour of the parents in the future, and might tip the scales where each parent has an equal case. It is understood by the courts that when relationships break down, partners can behave in a reprehensible way towards each other, but this does not of itself necessarily exclude either parent from being a good or adequate carer of a child.
Attitudes to contact between the child and the other parent can reveal whether a parent is genuinely concerned with the welfare of the child by allowing the other parent contact to the child or whether a parent is more interested in hurting the other parent by refusing contact, even though it is in the child interest to have contact with the other parent. In one case, where a father expressed himself as being reluctant to allow the mother to have contact if he was given residence, this was taken by the court as a serious matter and weighed heavily against his application for a residence order.
Before applying to the court for an order, parents are required to attend a mediation information and assessment meeting (MIAM).When making any order, the court will be required to apply the ‘welfare checklist’ in Section 1(3) of the Children Act. They will not make an order unless it is considered to be in the child’s best interest to do so. As any delay could affect the child’s well being, this must be avoided.
Applying to the Court
Once issued, the application will be considered by a nominated legal advisor or district judge, who will be known as the ‘gatekeeper’.
CAFCASS will undertake safeguarding inquiries and may make telephone risk identification inquiries with the parties. They will then note any issues which arise from the checks, and within 17 days of receiving the application send a ‘safeguarding letter’ to the court, with copies to the parties.
A first hearing dispute resolution appointment (FHDRA) will be fixed, and must be held between 5 and 6 weeks following issue of the application. The respondent must be given as much notice as possible of the hearing, and is required to file a response no later than 10 days before the hearing. Both parties must attend the FHDRA together with the CAFCASS officer, who will speak separately to the parties before the hearing. Throughout the hearing, the CAFCASS officer will endeavour to conciliate and broker agreement, and advise the court on ways to resolve the issues.
Where agreement is reached an order can be made
The First Hearing Dispute Resolution Appointment (FHDRA)
At the FHDRA, a judge or lay magistrate, often with the assistance of a CAFCASS officer, will explore ways of sorting out the issues and decide what the problems are really all about. It is in effect a conciliation hearing. Notwithstanding this, if any safety issues have become apparent from the checks carried out by CAFCASS, any orders necessary to safeguard the position for the children will be made.
The court will look at any factual issues which need to be decided before an order can be made, and if so, fix a fact finding hearing. They will also need to decide whether a report is needed from CAFCASS or social services. Directions will be given if reports or evidence from other parties are needed. A timetable will be fixed for the preparation and filing of reports, a hearing date fixed, should a fact-finding hearing be needed, and for a final hearing when evidence will be heard and the case decided, if not. Sometimes, a further directions hearing may be arranged, to consider progress and any changes in the parties’ positions.
If the parties cannot reach an agreement, further hearing date will be arranged.
You are likely to be required to prepare statements of your cases, for a CAFCASS officer to investigate and report, and possibly a report from other relevant experts. If CAFCASS are to write a report, the next hearing date is likely to be listed for two weeks after their report is prepared. The court may decide to make a temporary order (also called an interim order), which may last until the next hearing or beyond.
Articles on Child Law
CAFCASS reports A judge who has asked CAFCASS to prepare a report advising the court on what is in a child’s best interest is going to be heavily influenced by the report which the CAFCASS officer prepares. They are not bound to follow a CAFCASS recommendation but...
It can be devastating if your ex or former partner intends to move away and take your children with them. When a family breaks up the parent with whom the children live will sometimes wish to move away and relocate with the children miles away from the other parent....
Divorce may never be easy but it doesn't have to be stressful, expensive and time consuming. If you approach it in the right way it may not be a pleasant experience but it can certainly be made less painful. Here are some tips for an amicable divorce. 1. Don't seek...
Special Guardianship Special Guardians are appointed by the court where it is held that the best interests of the children are met by them having permanence and security but where adoption is not appropriate. A typical case where Special Guardians may be appointed...
Family Home Rights If, as a spouse or civil partner you do not legally own a share of the property you live in with your respective spouse or civil partner, you can protect your potential share in the property by way of a notice known as the ‘Matrimonial Home Rights...
The case of Re N (A Child) has eventually come to an end-hopefully. This case had been backwards and forwards to court and contains a number of lessons to be learnt not least the advantages of parents sorting out matters concerning their children themselves and...
A written parenting plan is most useful in setting the stage for a successful post-divorce relationship with your children;s other parent. Just the process of creating a parenting plan allows you and your ex-spouse to discuss most or all of the issues that will come...
A McKenzie friend is somebody who accompanies a litigant in person to a court hearing for the purpose of assisting him in such matters as taking notes, helping to organise the documents, and quietly making suggestions – for example as to questions to put to a witness....
In order to adopt a child you must be over 21 years of age and the child must be under the age of 18. If it is to be a joint application to adopt you must be married or in a civil partnership. If you are unmarried only one person can be the adopter. Very often the...
Parents with young children should always consider who will look after their children if they are unable to do so themselves and appoint a Guardian for their children to ensure that they are looked after by a suitable person in the event of their death or serious...
Prohibited steps and specific issue orders are made by the Family Court under Section 8 of the Children Act 1989 An application to the court for a prohibited steps order will be necessary when a parent or person with parental responsibility for a child requires...
The concept of Parental Responsibility was introduced by the Children Act 1989 and replaces the old idea of one or both parents having custody of a child. Parental Responsibility changes the emphasis of rights over children to a parent's responsibility for their...
eBooks on disputes over children
FAQs on disputes over children
How can I help my child deal with the family breakup?
- give as much reassurance to your children as possible;
- explain appropriately what is happening in ways that they can understand;
- maintain the family routine and rules as much as possible;
- be receptive to their feelings, concerns and questions;
- encourage them to have a relationship with both of you;
- reassure them that you as parents can manage your own affairs, that they need not be responsible for helping you;
- encourage them to talk about their feelings, particularly about the other parent, in a way that avoids them feeling divided loyalties.
- be critical of the other parent;
- do anything that would undermine the child’s relationship with the other parent;
- ‘lean on’ older children or ask them for advice;
- ignore children’s feelings or questions;
- assume that children who are quiet or placid on the outside are not suffering – they still need reassurance and tolerance;
- involve the children in your own battles.
What happens if we cannot agree the arrangements for the children?
Help is available to enable parents to agree the arrangements for their children and, before issuing an application for a judge to decide, you will be required to attend a mediation information assessment meeting, unless it is clear that mediation will not work or the application is urgent. You may then issue your application, which will be listed for a short first hearing in around six weeks.
What do I need to think about if our relationship is over and it looks like we are going to split up?
Before deciding finally that your relationship is over you should discuss this with family and friends and consider very carefully what life will be like as a single person. It may not be as rosy as you’d think, especially as a single parent. If having taken your time and thought things through carefully your decision is final, it will be time to tell your partner and children. How you tell particularly the children is most important. You will need to explain the practical arrangements to the children and whenever possible this should be done together by both parents.
At what age can a child choose which parent they will live with?
A Court is required to consider the wishes and feelings of a child with a consideration of his age and understanding of the situation. The older and more mature the child becomes, the more notice will be taken of his or her wishes. Understanding is equally important as age, and if the expressed wishes and feelings are irrational and possibly the result of pressure by the resident parent, they will not be taken into consideration.
Do children always live with their mother when their parents separate?
The court will look carefully at which parent is best able to meet the child’s day to day needs, physically and emotionally, now and in the future. At one time it was presumed, especially with young children, that these needs were best met by a mother. This presumption no longer applies, and both a mother and father are on an equal footing when being considered as the primary carers for their children.
Can I take my child abroad on holiday?
Unless a residence order or child arrangements order has been made, a parent may not take a child out of England and Wales without the permission of the other parent with parental responsibility. It does not matter whether the time abroad is for only a short period such as a family holiday.